Denial about Climate Change vs. Denial about Ineffectiveness of Current Approaches to Problem. By Gideon Rachman, FT, July 27, 2009. "The state of international negotiations presents a huge dilemma for climate change activists. Most genuinely believe that a failure to achieve an international agreement in Copenhagen would be catastrophic. But they also know that, even if a deal is reached, it is likely to be feeble and ineffective. If they admit this publicly, they risk creating a climate of despair and inaction. But if they press ahead, they are putting all their energy into an approach that they must know is highly unlikely to deliver. It is a horrible dilemma. But, in difficult situations, it is best to start by facing facts. The trouble is that -- in different ways -- both sides of the climate change debate are in denial."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment