World Bank to Limit Funding for Coal-Fired Power Stations. By Fiona Harvey, Guardian UK, 4/4/11. “The World Bank is planning to restrict the money it gives to coal-fired power stations, bowing to pressure from green campaigners to radically revise its funding rules. The new proposals would not mean an end to funding for fossil fuels, but would represent a departure from previous regulations. Under these rules, the bank has provided sizeable financial support for coal-fired power stations in the developing world in spite of protests from governments and green groups. Under the proposed new rules, only the very poorest countries would be eligible to receive grants or loans for building new coal-fired power stations, and then only if they could prove they were necessary and that alternatives -- such as renewable energy -- were not feasible.”
The Dark Lord of Coal Country. By Jeff Goodell, Rolling Stone, 11/29/10. “Unless you live in West Virginia, you've probably never heard of Don Blankenship. You might not know that he grew up in the coal fields of West Virginia, received an accounting degree from a local college, and, through a combination of luck, hard work and coldblooded ruthlessness, transformed himself into the embodiment of everything that's wrong with the business and politics of energy in America today -- a man who pursues naked self-interest and calls it patriotism, who buys judges like cheap hookers, treats workers like dogs, blasts mountains to get at a few inches of coal and uses his money and influence to ensure that America remains enslaved to the 19th-century idea that burning coal equals progress. And for this, he earns $18 million a year -- making him the highest-paid CEO in the coal industry -- and flies off to vacations on the French Riviera”… “OnDecember 3rd, a week after this article was published in Rolling Stone, Massey Energy announced that Don Blankenship will be retiring as CEO and chairman.”
Coal Looms Large in Texas Governor's Race. By Christa Marshall, ClimateWire, 10/21/10. “The man vying to be Texas' first Democratic governor in more than a decade mentions the fossil fuel immediately when asked about the biggest difference between himself and Republican Gov. Rick Perry. ‘Rick Perry is for more coal-fired plants. I'm for more natural gas, renewables and energy efficiency,’ said White, a former three-term mayor of Houston and deputy secretary of energy, in a phone interview with ClimateWire. Nationally, White said he would like to see coal's usage drop from 50 to 35 percent, a decline he said could occur in a dozen years or sooner.
Pipeline Plan Would Bury CO2 Under the Ocean off New Jersey. By Michael Miller, Atlantic City Press, 10/17/10. “An energy company wants to pump carbon dioxide under the ocean floor 70 miles off the New Jersey coast... SCS Energy LLC of Concord, Mass., wants to build a new coal-fired power plant on a former industrial site in Linden in Union County, near Staten Island. The company plans to separate carbon dioxide from the coal and pump the liquefied gas 138 miles away to a drilling platform off Atlantic City, where it conceivably could remain buried forever beneath the Atlantic Ocean…
“Environmentalists and some local residents say the [carbon capture and storage] technology is unproven and dangerous… SCS has two wells about 70 miles east of Atlantic City that would pump carbon dioxide 1.5 miles below the ocean floor, displacing seawater under multiple layers of shale and sandstone... Energy companies in the 1970s closely studied the geology of the continental shelf off Atlantic City when they were looking unsuccessfully for oil. Instead, Mascaro said, they drilled through layers of rock and sediment ‘perfect’ for capturing carbon dioxide.”
EPA Urges Revoking West Virginia Mountaintop Mining Permit. By John M. Broder, NYTimes, 10/16/10. “A top federal regulator has recommended revoking the permit for one of the nation’s largest planned mountaintop removal mining projects, saying it would be devastating to miles of West Virginia streams and the plant and animal life they support. In a report submitted last month and made public on Friday, Shawn M. Garvin, EPA regional administrator for the Mid-Atlantic, said that Arch Coal’s proposed Spruce No. 1 Mine in Logan County should be stopped because it ‘would likely have unacceptable adverse effects on wildlife.’
“In 2007, the Bush administration approved the project, which would involve dynamiting the tops off mountains over 2,278 acres to get at the coal beneath while dumping the resulting rubble, known as spoil, into nearby valleys and streams. The Obama administration announced last year that it would review the decision, prompting the mine owner, Arch Coal, based in St. Louis, to sue. In its review, the E.P.A. found that the project would bury more than seven miles of the Pigeonroost Branch and Oldhouse Branch streams under 110 million cubic yards of spoil, killing everything in them and sending downstream a flood of contaminants, toxic substances and life-choking algae. Kim Link, a spokeswoman for Arch Coal, said in a statement that the company intended to ‘vigorously’ challenge the recommendation. ‘If the E.P.A. proceeds with its unlawful veto of the Spruce permit -- as it appears determined to do -- West Virginia’s economy and future tax base will suffer a serious blow,’ Ms. Link said. She said the company planned to spend $250 million on the project, creating 250 jobs and tens of millions of dollars in tax revenues in a struggling region.”
World Bank Funding More Coal Plants than Ever. By Jack Duffy, NYTimes,10/11/10. “Once the coal-fired Medupi Power Station in Lephalale, South Africa, is fully operational in 2015, it will emit 26 million tons of carbon dioxide a year. And when the Tata Ultra Mega plant in western India is fully serviceable in 2012, its annual carbon dioxide emissions are expected to total 23.4 million tons. Both plants, which will rank among the world’s largest sources of greenhouse gases -- together producing about as much carbon dioxide as nations like Ireland and Norway -- are being built thanks to more than $4 billion in financing from the World Bank. The amount of money that the World Bank is lending for fossil fuel energy projects like these -- for coal in particular -- is rising faster than ever, even though it said only two years ago in a policy document that climate change posed one of the greatest threats to development in poor countries.
“According to the Bank Information Center, a Washington-based watchdog group, World Bank group funding for fossil fuel projects reached a record $6.3 billion in the fiscal year that ended in June, up from $1.6 billion in fiscal 2007. Funding for coal projects in 2010 was $4.4 billion, also a record, the group said… With 1.5 billion people worldwide living without access to electricity and many more whose energy services are either sporadic or cost-prohibitive, the World Bank has sought to fulfill its core mandate of alleviating poverty in part by increasing access to energy. But the bank is now finding itself under growing pressure to deliver that energy without an accompanying increase in carbon emissions.”
Planned Coal Plant Generates Controversy in Texas. By Matthew Tresaugue, Houston Chronicle, September 25, 2010. "The idea had undeniable power at first: the cleanest coal-fired plant in Texas. But now, with the White Stallion Energy Center about to receive an air pollution permit from the state, many local officials and residents are having second thoughts -- even in the face of 12% unemployment... In and around Bay City, the county's hub, opponents are planting roadside signs showing a menacing monster billowing from smokestacks, with the rallying cry: 'Stop White Stallion Coal Plant'… Others see promise instead of peril. Supporters of the $3 billion proposal include officials at the Matagorda County Economic Development Corp., the Bay City Chamber of Commerce and the superintendent of the Bay City Independent School District. They say the plant would mean hundreds of jobs, higher incomes and better lives for some of the 38,000 people in the county… Coal is the dirtiest fuel for making electricity, but jobs are a big motivating factor in towns that are struggling. And that's why some folks think Randy Bird picked Bay City. 'We're simply too small, with no political clout, and hungry for economic development,' said Robert Malina, a retired professor who has led a local group called the No Coal Coalition."
Coal Miners Go to Washington to Protest Mountaintop Removal Regulations. By Ambreen Ali, Congress.org, September 15, 2010. "Hundreds of coal miners and their families gathered on Capitol Hill Wednesday [September 15] in an industry-led protest against regulation, while a smaller group of environmentalists held a counter-rally. The larger event -- sponsored by trade groups from Kentucky, West Virginia, Virginia, and Ohio -- took aim at the Democrats' cap-and-trade plan and the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed greenhouse gas regulations. 'We're here to say to this administration, wisen up. Coal runs this country,' Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) said, prompting a loud burst of cheers from the crowd. Rogers was one of a dozen lawmakers expected to speak at the event, most of whom hailed from coal-mining territory. Their message was clear: Coal runs the country, and it employs Americans. Most of the activists present wore identical blue shirts and held pre-printed signs calling on Congress to save coal jobs. Others said, 'This is a coal hard fact…. Coal keeps the lights on,' and, 'Coal miners love mountains, too.'"
Germany's Merkel Sets Stage for Nuclear Battle. By Simon Sturdee, AFP, September 6, 2010. "Chancellor Angela Merkel on Monday hailed government proposals to postpone Germany's exit from nuclear power as a 'revolution,' setting up what one opposition MP called a 'fiery autumn' of protests. 'The government yesterday approved a far-reaching and sweeping concept for energy production in the coming decades, making our power generation the most efficient and most environmentally friendly in the world,' Merkel said Monday. 'This means that we need nuclear energy, as well as coal, as a bridge technology. I know that many people are very skeptical and critical of nuclear power, and we take these concerns completely seriously.'… Opposition parties and environmentalists have vowed to fight the planned extension in the lifetime of Germany's 17 nuclear reactors for an average of 12 years beyond the scheduled shutdown of around 2020… Even if the extension becomes law, the opposition Social Democrats (SPD), co-authors with the Greens of 2000's decision to exit nuclear power, said they will reverse Merkel's changes if they return to power."
Appalachia Rising: A National Protest in Washington, Sept. 27, to End Mountaintop Removal. Appalachia Rising, September, 2010. Appalachia Rising is a mass mobilization in Washington, DC, September 25-27, 2010, calling for an end to the devastating practice of mountaintop removal mining. Mountaintop removal has already destroyed over 500 of the world's oldest mountains and more than 2,000 miles of streams, and has contaminated our nation's waters. Together, we will bring Appalachia's cry to our nation's capital: We must end mountaintop removal and transform the economies of Appalachia away from destructive mining practices and toward clean-energy jobs and a sustainable and healthy future.
"The weekend includes two full days of strategizing workshops, learning, featured speaker panels and discussions, cultural events, and entertainment. On Monday, September 27, we will march, rally, and support individuals taking part in dignified non-violent civil disobedience against mountaintop removal mining. Join thousands of Appalachian and national leaders, policymakers, coalfield residents and miners, concerned citizens, activists, mountain groups, environmental justice organizations, and Americans from coast to coast for this momentous movement-building summit, gathering, and call to action. Hear the voices of those most impacted by mountaintop removal coal mining, and let your voice be heard in this movement to offer America hope for a better future."

